Showing posts with label Jew-Lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jew-Lies. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Jew quack and inventor of ADHD admits disease was fictitious - Goy Drs; invented to start kids on lifetime drug addiction

Jew quack and inventor of ADHD admits disease was fictitious - Goy Drs;  invented to start kids on lifetime drug addiction


 Jews, they are not nationalist, they are internationalist. And their plan is total global domination. But prior to complete control, they must destroy any and all once healthy and homogenous societies. And because White nations and peoples were the most advanced and powerful, that’s where they started. And they’ve since acquired the power to send  Whites to fight their now ‘other present day enemies,’ the Arabs and the phony religionist... the Islamists and Muslims. Yet, they continue the unrelenting attacks to weaken the White race even more. This is yet another example of that destruction. Whites invented various disciplinary actions for their disobedient children IE;  a trip to the woodshed, grounding, a stern lecture. Jews, they invented drugs. Mood altering ‘downer’ drugs - drugs to keep the White race docile, inactive and stupid. And at such young and tender ages. Your children and jews - can you understand now?

ETA-Expose Them All

-------------------------------------

Leon Eisenberg - the jew who invented ADHD



https://www.google.com/search?num=20&safe=off&q=Leon+Eisenberg%2Bfictitious+disease%2Bjewish&spell=1&sa=X&ei=rzXLUa_xOIHirAHmvoHgDw&ved=0CCoQvwUoAA&biw=1600&bih=705

http://dcclothesline.com/2013/05/25/father-of-adhd-admitted-in-final-interview-that-disease-was-fictitious/

http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/50658265043/adhd-is-a-fictitious-disease

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/382293/

http://www.currentconcerns.ch/index.php?id=1608

http://www.naturalnews.com/040552_autism_children_genius_IQ.html

http://www.cchrint.org/2010/10/30/1-million-misdiagnosed-adhd-children-for-80b-drug-industry/

http://www.naturalnews.com/z040938_ADHD_fictitious_disease_psychiatry.html

________________________________________________________

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Holocaust: Camp Survivors Who Told the Truth

Below, a GIF with images from inside the German "Death Camps"




RE: "Camp Survivors Who Told the Truth" (MP4 video - Link here and below)

In what the Zionists/Marxists now call 'death camps' - there were orchestras, musical instrument training, movie theaters and daycares. The inhabitants of the ‘death camps’ were also encouraged to organize plays, band concerts and form sports teams. They were supplied with postcards and stamps to write home. And they were even allowed money to spend at the camp cantina’s. All this and more, as they were supposedly awaiting a fate and date inside a German controlled crematorium.

Even after understanding the above, anyone who dare questions the alleged ‘holocaust’ would be considered a ‘holocaust denier.’ Yet what most are doing are “questioning” rather than denying anything. And with the tale becoming ever more unreasonable, unbelievable and fantastic, while the evidence to the contrary of a 'holocaust' stacks up, is there any wonder why anyone with a functioning brain may have more than a few questions?

And while one may question some events surrounding WW2, no one is denying that some jews were harmed, mistreated and even killed. But, any harm done was not confined solely to jews. There were sixty-million other people (of all nationalities) who perished during the events of WW2. Yet there’s only one group who uses those deaths as a tool against other races and nations. There’s only one group who continues to demand our children be taught of how evil they are, how evil their great-grandfathers were, because of what they supposedly had done against jews. There’s only one group who continues to build ‘holocaust museums’ and ‘remembrances’ all over the world. Even in countries such as America, Canada, Britain and on and on. Even though the alleged atrocities were supposedly against jews, by Germans and mainly on Polish soil. There’s only one group who continually sues for ‘holocaust reparation checks’ - given first to ‘holocaust survivors’ and now more lately to ‘holocaust survivor decedents.’ And that group are the main accusers of a deed that may never have been done.

This is not even to mention the hundreds of people languishing in jails and prisons in countries that have passed ‘holocaust denial’ laws. How the ‘holocaust’ benefited Zionists in securing Palestine. Of how it’s used (along with other alleged atrocities committed by Whites) to open the floodgates of western nations to the non-white hoards. As this is ostensibly one punishment for Whites to make 'amends' for past wrongs. And of course worldwide sympathies for the Zionists to get their way on many fronts. And the so-called ‘holocaust’ has brainwashed millions of people along the way. Innocent jews included. Jews who are taught that the world wants to kill them and they must be weary of all non-jews. This has led many of them to Zionism, to where they collectively scream, claw and toss vile accusations against perceived enemies all while hiding under a veil of victimhood. The ‘holocaust,’ it’s not a tool of togetherness, love, hope and inspiration, it’s a tool of division, guilt, hate and animosity. It’s a weapon to control, divide and conquer!


PS. What the above mentioned video didn't explain was that the 'death camps' also contained barber shops, beauty shops, olympic sized swimming pools, calisthenics routines, wedding chapels, medical/dental facilities, sick bays for recuperation, kitchens, slaughter houses for food processing, horticulture projects, laundry areas and on and on and on.

Were or should the German camps be considered as a modern day 5 star hotel in New York, Paris or London? Of course not but the point is, they were NOT torturing and murdering jews by the millions as is claimed by the Zionists and their stooges and dupes either. And by military camp standards, they were in many ways better than the ones under US, French and British control. And that's if a captured German was lucky enough to ever see the inside of a western camp. As more often than not, the order was to; "take no prisoners." In other words, any captured German prisoners were executed on the spot or left to starve to death in a local prison or a real ‘death camp.‘

----------------------------------------------

Links:

First, the link that links to the video “Camp Survivors Who Told the Truth” = Here

Second, Holocaust: Jews Treated Good in Camps in Germany

Third, "Defamation" (the movie and PDF file)

Fourth, plenty of holocaust material here - browse around

________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Edit - Uploaded: Yoav Shamir interview (Defamation Director) (MP3)


___________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Spielberg’s Lincoln


Spielberg’s Lincoln 

by Alec Ryan


Steven Spielberg’s latest “historical” sermon begins with The Bearded One smiling beatifically at two black Union soldiers, who recount their exploits at a battle that is a figment of Mr. Spielberg’s imagination. The bolder, more intelligent of the two hectors the President on the pay inequalities between black and white soldiers. The scene is interspersed with footage from the mythical battle, in which black Union troops overcome white Confederates in brutal hand-to-hand combat. A white face is stamped, drowning, into the mud by a booted black man.

This may be all you need to know about the movie.

Two white, hick Union soldiers run up breathlessly and ineptly try to recite Lincoln’s Gettysburg address for the President. They forget how it ends, and the recital is finished by the intelligent, complaining black private as he saunters off into the night. Stupid whites and smart blacks. We get it. We see that in every TV commercial during basketball timeouts.

It is all downhill from there, as Daniel Day-Lewis’s simpering, unbelievable Lincoln is surrounded by saintly, misty-eyed, cardboard-cutout blacks, as he battles courageously against the reactionary elements in Congress who would never give votes to “the Negro.” In fact, blacks had been voting in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey since the Articles of Confederation, and the 15th Amendment, which gave blacks the right to vote, was passed just a few years later, in 1869.

Someone remarks that the Confederates “want to take slavery even into South America.” The Spanish brought black slaves to the New World more than 100 years before the first slaves appeared in the British colonies, and slavery wasn’t abolished in Cuba until 1886 and Brazil in 1888. But who cares about the real story? Apart from a few enlightened men such as Lincoln and Thaddeus Stevens, all whites were rabid racists all too willing to sell out blacks for peace with the South, even when it was in its death throes. Mr. Spielberg knows that such distortions will slip past uncritical audiences.

The subtext, of course, is that the Union could not have defeated the Confederacy without the valiant efforts of black soldiers. Since the Union was full of vicious racists, they would have left blacks as they were had Lincoln not listened to urgings of his sanctified black housemaid and other ebony worthies.

In the modern Hollywood narrative, all American history revolves around the Sacred Black Experience. Lincoln confirms this, bending historical truth to paint the most ruthless, bloody-minded, strong-willed American leader in history as some kind of smug, pre-post-modern storyteller croaking gamely through the difficulties like a paleface Obama sans teleprompter. The few Southerners are snarling, greasy bigots, recoiling before the erect, scowling black Union guards as they slink by during a meeting that led to the Hampton Roads peace conference of February 1865.

No noble Lee, courageous Stonewall or knightly Forrest to see here; but why should we expect that? I was surprised not to see the Southern delegation accompanied by blond, Afrikaans-speaking advisors from South Africa, along with a few monocled British Empire villains. Another surprise was that General Grant was not played by Morgan Freeman or that Magic Negro extraordinaire, Samuel L. Jackson.

The film has throughout a sense of hushed awe, as if kowtowing to its own self-evident righteousness. There is no balance, no complexity, no sense of inner struggle or desperation. No opposing arguments. Its simplistic outlook more closely resembles the popcorn-psychology Avengers or Justice League rather than the serious historical movie that it clearly wishes to be acclaimed.

Mr. Day-Lewis radiates pompous self-absorption, and his interpretation jars against my gut-feeling of Lincoln, the rawboned, shrewd backwoods attorney–Lincoln, the Illinois rogue so memorably sketched in Flash for Freedom! by George MacDonald Fraser. Yes, Lincoln is involved in political skulduggery and intrigue, as the three fixers/bribers blunder and cajole their way through improbable situations in an effort to sway the House for the 13th Amendment, but it comes off as silly capering.

There is not the slightest hint, of course, that Lincoln wanted to free the slaves and then send them out of the country. No dramatic scenes from August 14, 1862, when Lincoln invited five black preachers to the White House and asked them to persuade other blacks to resettle in Central America. No earnest conversations between Lincoln and Rev. James Mitchell, whom he had put in charge of exporting blacks. All this would make eye-opening cinema, but why let the truth spoil an image of Lincoln as a pioneer egalitarian?

To Mr. Spielberg’s credit, the cinematography is superb, as is the period detail. Articulate speeches are also a welcome respite from the usual lowbrow movie soundbites. Yet the work is let down by the smarmy lead performance of Daniel Day-Lewis, as well as the historical inaccuracies and stereotypes, which have obviously been inserted to foist a politically-correct message onto the audience. And when will we get a realistic, multifaceted black character in a movie, instead of the constant stream of sinless, chocolate-hued demigods? When will the Magic Negro finally be retired? No time soon, judging by this travesty.

An interesting movie about black battlefield valor might be made about the troops who served in General George Crook’s Apache campaigns during the 1870s and 1880s. But would we see a black boot trampling an Apache face?

It is hardly astonishing that Hollywood has turned out yet another movie with an anti-white agenda this time from the director of the execrable Munich, which also played fast and loose with history in its sordid depiction of Israel’s use of a team of bungling amateurs to carry out a series of cold-blooded assassinations. Mr. Spielberg has, however, accomplished the unthinkable with this one. He has actually succeeded in making the Civil War look schmaltzy and one dimensional. The Sacred Black Experience is the only history that matters, and the only thing that ever prevented these noble Negroes from attaining their uplifting potential was foaming old white guys with mutton-chops.

As my wife and I left the cinema for the cold night, a pair of young black men swaggered by, baggy pants sagging past their buttocks, communicating in barely decipherable ebonic grunts.
We looked at each other with wry smiles and sighed.

Mr. Ryan describes himself as an ordinary working American with a strong interest in history. He lives in Las Vegas.


___________________________________________________________________________